4.5 Article

Differentiated demographic histories and local adaptations between Sherpas and Tibetans

Journal

GENOME BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-017-1242-y

Keywords

Sherpa; Tibetan; Next-generation sequencing; High-altitude adaptation; Population history; Gene flow

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDB13040100]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [QYZDJ-SSW-SYS009]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [91331204, 31711530221, 31501011, 31260252, 31460286]
  4. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [31525014]
  5. Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader [16XD1404700]
  6. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (STCSM) [14YF1406800, 16YF1413900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The genetic relationships reported by recent studies between Sherpas and Tibetans are controversial. To gain insights into the population history and the genetic basis of high-altitude adaptation of the two groups, we analyzed genome-wide data in 111 Sherpas (Tibet and Nepal) and 177 Tibetans (Tibet and Qinghai), together with available data from present-day human populations. Results: Sherpas and Tibetans show considerable genetic differences and can be distinguished as two distinct groups, even though the divergence between them (similar to 3200-11,300 years ago) is much later than that between Han Chinese and either of the two groups (similar to 6200-16,000 years ago). Sub-population structures exist in both Sherpas and Tibetans, corresponding to geographical or linguistic groups. Differentiation of genetic variants between Sherpas and Tibetans associated with adaptation to either high-altitude or ultraviolet radiation were identified and validated by genotyping additional Sherpa and Tibetan samples. Conclusions: Our analyses indicate that both Sherpas and Tibetans are admixed populations, but the findings do not support the previous hypothesis that Tibetans derive their ancestry from Sherpas and Han Chinese. Compared to Tibetans, Sherpas show higher levels of South Asian ancestry, while Tibetans show higher levels of East Asian and Central Asian/Siberian ancestry. We propose a new model to elucidate the differentiated demographic histories and local adaptations of Sherpas and Tibetans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available