4.4 Article

Alternating pH landscapes shape epithelial cancer initiation and progression: Focus on pancreatic cancer

Journal

BIOESSAYS
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201600253

Keywords

interstitium; PDAC; pH regulation; secretion; tumor microenvironment

Funding

  1. Marie Curie Initial Training Network IonTraC [289648]
  2. Danish Research Council [12-127290]
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF13OC0007353]
  4. Lundbeck Foundation [R173-2014-1462]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence [EXC 1003-CiM]
  6. University of Munster, Germany
  7. Deutsche Krebshilfe [110261]
  8. Lundbeck Foundation [R173-2014-1462] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF13OC0007353] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present here the hypothesis that the unique microenvironmental pH landscape of acid-base transporting epithelia is an important factor in development of epithelial cancers, by rendering the epithelial and stromal cells pre-adapted to the heterogeneous extracellular pH(pH(e)) in the tumor microenvironment. Cells residing in organs with net acid-base transporting epithelia such as the pancreatic ductal and gastric epithelia are exposed to very different, temporally highly variable pH(e) values apically and basolaterally. This translates into spatially and temporally non-uniform intracellular pH (pH(i)) patterns. Disturbed pH(e)- and pH(i)-homeostasis contributes to essentially all hallmarks of cancer. Our hypothesis, that the physiological pH(e) microenvironment in acid-base secreting epithelia shapes cancers arising in these tissues, can be tested using novel imaging tools. The acidic tumor pH(e) in turn might be exploited therapeutically. Pancreatic cancers are used as our prime example, but we propose that this concept is also relevant for other cancers of acid-base transporting epithelia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available