4.8 Article

Magnetic microspheres-based cytometric bead array assay for highly sensitive detection of ochratoxin A

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 420-428

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.025

Keywords

Cytometric bead array; Magnetic microspheres; Indirect competition; Ochratoxin A; Malt

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81473346, 81573595, 81673593]
  2. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences [2016-I2M-3-010]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7152101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate and sensitive quantification of a specific class of mycotoxins at trace levels in complex matrices with greener approaches is of significant importance. In this study, a green and economical protocol of magnetic microspheres-based cytometric bead array (CBA) assay on indirect competitive principle was developed for sensitive and rapid detection of ochratoxin A (OTA) in malts with a small number of standard and sample solutions. The protocol included the competition of OTA in malt samples and that covalently coupled on the surface of microspheres with its monoclonal antibodies, the separation and aggregation of the magnetic microspheres, and the fluorescence detection of fluorescein isothiocyanate labeled goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G probes. The magnetic microspheres-based CBA assay allowed for ultralow limit of detection (0.025-mu g kg(-1)) for OTA and showed higher sensitivity compared with the common polystyrene beads-based CBA method. This is the first report on the magnetic microspheres-based CBA assay by using a simple and easy to-operate magnetic separator for highly sensitive and rapid detection of OTA in complex malt samples. By consuming less solvent, time and cost, as well as fewer standard and samples, the developed green protocol expressed high potential for one-site real-time detection of trace components in complex matrices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available