4.8 Article

ER-mitochondria contacts control surface glycan expression and sensitivity to killer lymphocytes in glioma stem-like cells

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 36, Issue 11, Pages 1493-1512

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201695429

Keywords

cancer cell glycocalyx; cytotoxic lymphocytes; ER-mitochondria contacts; glioma; glioma stem-like cells

Funding

  1. Foundation Privee des HUG
  2. ERC [ERC-2010-StG_20091118]
  3. Foundation Boninchi
  4. Ambizione SNSF [PZ00P3_126710/1]
  5. Carlos and Elsie de Reuter Foundation
  6. Schmidheiny Foundation
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P3_126710] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K17758] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glioblastoma is a highly heterogeneous aggressive primary brain tumor, with the glioma stem-like cells (GSC) being more sensitive to cytotoxic lymphocyte-mediated killing than glioma differentiated cells (GDC). However, the mechanism behind this higher sensitivity is unclear. Here, we found that the mitochondrial morphology of GSCs modulates the ER-mitochondria contacts that regulate the surface expression of sialylated glycans and their recognition by cytotoxic T lymphocytes and natural killer cells. GSCs displayed diminished ER-mitochondria contacts compared to GDCs. Forced ER-mitochondria contacts in GSCs increased their cell surface expression of sialylated glycans and reduced their susceptibility to cytotoxic lymphocytes. Therefore, mitochondrial morphology and dynamism dictate the ER-mitochondria contacts in order to regulate the surface expression of certain glycans and thus play a role in GSC recognition and elimination by immune effector cells. Targeting the mitochondrial morphology, dynamism, and contacts with the ER could be an innovative strategy to deplete the cancer stem cell compartment to successfully treat glioblastoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available