4.7 Article

Organophosphorus flame retardants in. mangrove sediments from the Pearl River Estuary, South China

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 181, Issue -, Pages 433-439

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.117

Keywords

Organophosphorus flame retardants; Distribution; Microbial community structure; Mangrove sediments; The Pearl River Estuary

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41573084, 41401576, 41303082, 41230639]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [201605120703324]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2014B030301064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forty-eight surface sediments were collected from three mangrove wetlands in the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) of South China to investigate the distribution of organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) and the relationship between OPFRs and microbial community structure determined by phospholipid fatty acid. Concentrations of Sigma OPFRs in mangrove sediments of the PRE ranged from 13.2 to 377.1 ng g(-1) dry weight. Levels of OPFRs in mangrove sediments from Shenzhen and Guangzhou were significantly higher than those from Zhuhai, indicating that OPFRs were linked to industrialization and urbanization. Tris(chloropropyl)phosphate was the predominant profile of OPFRs in mangrove sediments from Shenzhen (38.9%) and Guangzhou (35.0%), while the composition profile of OPFRs in mangrove sediments from Zhuhai was dominated by tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (25.5%). The mass inventories of OPFRs in the mangrove sediments of Guangzhou, Zhuhai and Shenzhen were 439.5, 133.5 and 6623 ng cm(-2), respectively. Redundancy analysis revealed that OPFRs induced a shift in the structure of mangrove sediment microbial community and the variations were significantly correlated with tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl)phosphate and tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available