4.4 Article

Insulin Treatment Attenuates Decline of Muscle Mass in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Journal

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 1-8

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-017-0251-x

Keywords

Sarcopenia; Insulin; Type 2 diabetes; Diabetes treatment

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sarcopenia is defined as an age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, and is a major cause of disability and mobility limitations. Recent studies have demonstrated that type 2 diabetes and insulin signaling deficiencies contribute to the progression of sarcopenia, suggesting that a sufficient supply of insulin to the skeletal muscles may be important for the maintenance of muscle function; however, little has been reported regarding whether insulin treatment can protect against sarcopenia. We conducted a retrospective observational study to examine the impact of insulin treatment on the muscle mass of patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 312 patients (mean age: 64 +/- 11 years; 40.8% female; 27.6% treated with insulin) were studied in this retrospective observational study. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) and grip strength (kg) were used to assess sarcopenia. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 18.0%. Insulin treatment was shown to be protective against the annual decline of SMI (standardized beta 0.195; p = 0.025) even after adjusting for covariates, including age, gender, duration of diabetes, and body mass index. In a cohort matched by propensity scores, insulin treatment significantly increased the 1-year change in SMI (mean +/- SE) compared with non-insulin-treated group (2.40 +/- 0.98% vs. -0.43 +/- 0.98%; p = 0.050). Our data suggest that insulin treatment could attenuate the progression of sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available