4.7 Article

Accelerated mineral carbonation curing of cement paste for CO2 sequestration and enhanced properties of blended calcium silicate

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 323, Issue -, Pages 320-329

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.157

Keywords

Mineral carbonation curing; CO2 capture; Calcium silicate; Kinetics study; Gaseous permeability

Funding

  1. National Key Projects for Fundamental Research and Development of China [2016YFB0600904]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mineral carbonation (MC) curing of cement-based materials could be employed to obtain both CO2 sequestration and accelerated strength gain. But there is still absence of understanding on the gas-solid reaction kinetics and mechanisms. This study aims to improve the understanding of gas-solid reaction between CO2 and cement-based materials during the MC curing, and evaluate the feasibility of blending calcium silicate (CS) as intensified addition. Based on the accelerated carbonation experiments, the impact of different factors (pressure, temperature and water-to-binder rate) on the reaction rate and the CO2 uptake were systematically investigated. The MC curing showed significant diffusion controlled kinetics and the reaction gradually turned into the stable product-layer diffusion controlling process. The evolution process of kinetics indicated the increasingly dense structure of cement matrix, as verified by SEM analysis. The blended CS was found to significantly enhance the reaction rate and CO2 uptake capacity, accompanied with the intensified carbonation conversion of cement components. The increased Klinkenberg permeability of blended CS paste after MC curing demonstrated the diluted effect of CS. In terms of the practical feasibility, MC curing also contributed remarkably to the compressive performance improvement of cement paste with blended CS. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available