4.6 Article

Unraveling the Oxygen-Reduction Sites in Graphitic-Carbon Co-N-C-Type Electrocatalysts Prepared by Single-Precursor Pyrolysis

Journal

CHEMCATCHEM
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 1969-1978

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201700324

Keywords

carbon; cobalt; doping; fuel cells; nitrogen

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) through Israel National Research Center for Electrochemical Propulsion (INREP)
  2. I-CORE Program [2797/11]
  3. INREP
  4. Ariel University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal- and nitrogen-doped carbon-based hybrid materials (M-N-C) are widely regarded as promising alternative to platinum for catalyzing the oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR) in fuel-cell cathodes. The two important steps involved in the preparation of these catalysts are acid washing and a second heat treatment of the pyrolyzed mixture made of carbon, nitrogen, and metal precursors (M). We have explored in detail the changes induced by the post-treatment steps on structure, composition, and oxygen-reduction activity of new hybrid catalysts prepared by the prolonged pyrolysis of a single well-defined organometallic precursor. The marginal increase in nitrogen content, apparent BET surface area, porosity, surface defects, and the higher degree of graphitization positively contribute to the substantial improvement in ORR activity of post-treated catalysts in alkaline solution, whereas this procedure is found to have a weaker influence on the ORR activity in acid solution. The findings from this study suggest that both free and nitrogen-coordinated metal sites, specifically, Co2N sites, which are present in the catalyst bulk and protected by the nitrogen-doped graphitic carbon layer, are most likely the active sites in Co-N-C catalysts. Based on these experimental results, we propose a model that will assist in improving the understanding of plausible functioning of these active sites in acid and alkaline solution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available