4.6 Article

Anomalous photoluminescence thermal quenching of sandwiched single layer MoS2

Journal

OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages 3697-3705

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OME.7.003697

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST)
  2. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KACST TIC R2-FP-008, BAS/1/1614-01-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report an unusual thermal quenching of the micro-photoluminescence (mu-PL) intensity for a sandwiched single-layer (SL) MoS2. For this study, MoS2 layers were chemical vapor deposited on molecular beam epitaxial grown In0.15Al0.85N lattice matched templates. Later, to accomplish air-stable sandwiched SL-MoS2, a thin In0.15Al0.85N cap layer was deposited on the MoS2/In0.15Al0.85N heterostructure. We confirm that the sandwiched MoS2 is a single layer from optical and structural analyses using mu-Raman spectroscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy, respectively. By using high-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, no structural phase transition of MoS2 is noticed. The recombination processes of bound and free excitons were analyzed by the power-dependent mu-PL studies at 77 K and room temperature (RT). The temperature-dependent micro photoluminescence (TDPL) measurements were carried out in the temperature range of 77-400 K. As temperature increases, a significant red-shift is observed for the free-exciton PL peak, revealing the delocalization of carriers. Further, we observe unconventional negative thermal quenching behavior, the enhancement of the mu-PL intensity with increasing temperatures up to 300K, which is explained by carrier hopping transitions that take place between shallow localized states to the band-edges. Thus, this study renders a fundamental insight into understanding the anomalous thermal quenching of mu-PL intensity of sandwiched SL-MoS2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available