4.3 Article

The dominant role of proofreading exonuclease activity of replicative polymerase ε in cellular tolerance to cytarabine (Ara-C)

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 20, Pages 33457-33474

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16508

Keywords

replicative polymerase epsilon; proofreading exonuclease; chainterminator; nucleoside analog; cytarabine (Ara-C)

Funding

  1. Program of the network-type joint Usage/Research Center for Radiation Disaster Medical Science of Hiroshima University
  2. Fukushima Medical University
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [25281021, 26116518, 24114509, 16K12598, 16H02957, 25650006, 23221005, 16H06306]
  4. Takeda Science Foundation
  5. JSPS Core-to-Core Program, A. Advanced Research Networks
  6. Center for Cancer Research, as the Intramural Program of the National Cancer Institute, NIH [BC 006150]
  7. Nagasaki University
  8. MRC [MC_U105178808] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Medical Research Council [MC_U105178808] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K12595, 26116518, 16K12598, 25650006, 16H06306, 25281021, 24114509, 16H02957] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemotherapeutic nucleoside analogs, such as Ara-C, 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Trifluridine (FTD), are frequently incorporated into DNA by the replicative DNA polymerases. However, it remains unclear how this incorporation kills cycling cells. There are two possibilities: Nucleoside analog triphosphates inhibit the replicative DNA polymerases, and/or nucleotide analogs mis-incorporated into genomic DNA interfere with the next round of DNA synthesis as replicative DNA polymerases recognize them as template DNA lesions, arresting synthesis. To address the first possibility, we selectively disrupted the proofreading exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase epsilon (Pole), the leading-strand replicative polymerase in avian DT40 and human TK6 cell lines. To address the second, we disrupted RAD18, a gene involved in translesion DNA synthesis, a mechanism that relieves stalled replication. Strikingly, POLE1(exo-/-) cells, but not RAD18(-/-) cells, were hypersensitive to Ara-C, while RAD18(-/-) cells were hypersensitive to FTD.gamma H2AX focus formation following a pulse of Ara-C was immediate and did not progress into the next round of replication, while gamma H2AX focus formation following a pulse of 5-FU and FTD was delayed to the next round of replication. Biochemical studies indicate that human proofreading-deficient Pol epsilon-exo(-) holoenzyme incorporates Ara-CTP, but subsequently extend from this base several times less efficiently than from intact nucleotides. Together our results suggest that Ara-C acts by blocking extension of the nascent DNA strand and is counteracted by the proofreading activity of Pole, while 5-FU and FTD are efficiently incorporated but act as replication fork blocks in the subsequent S phase, which is counteracted by translesion synthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available