4.1 Review

Surgical rates in the era of biological therapy: up, down or unchanged?

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 246-253

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000361

Keywords

biologics; colectomy; inflammatory bowel disease; surgery

Funding

  1. Merck
  2. Abbvie
  3. Janssen
  4. Genentech
  5. Mitsubishi
  6. Ferring
  7. Norgine
  8. Tillots
  9. Vifor
  10. Therakos
  11. Pharmacosmos
  12. Pilege
  13. BMS
  14. UCB-pharma
  15. Hospira
  16. Celltrion
  17. Takeda
  18. Biogaran
  19. Boerhinger-Ingelheim
  20. Lilly
  21. Pfizer
  22. HAC-Pharma
  23. Index Pharmaceuticals
  24. Amgen
  25. Sandoz

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewThe aim of this review is to summarize data regarding surgical trends in inflammatory bowel disease in the prebiologic and biologic era, with a focus on population-based studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Recent findingsThere is paucity of data in RCTs regarding surgical rates, with only a few clinical trials reporting them. From the available data, meta-analyses of RCTs have concluded that antitumor necrosis agents (anti-TNF) reduce surgical rates in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. A large body of evidence from population-based studies from different regions of the world is available to evaluate surgical trends before and after the introduction of anti-TNF agents. The risk of surgery decreased significantly over the past six decades; these decreasing trends continued in the biologic era, which might indicate a potential beneficial disease-modifying effect of biologics. There is lack of data with nonanti-TNF biologics (i.e. anti-integrins and ustekinumab) regarding the risk of surgery.SummaryAlthough data from population-based studies and available RCTs suggest a protective effect from surgery of anti-TNF agents, definitive conclusions should be drawn only when more disease-modifying trials with different biologics and treatment strategies become available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available