4.6 Article

Optical signatures of spin-orbit exciton in bandwidth-controlled Sr2IrO4 epitaxial films via high-concentration Ca and Ba doping

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 95, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.235125

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1454200, DMR-1265162, DMR-1712101, DMR-1262261]
  2. RIKEN iTHES Project
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1262261] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1454200, 1712101] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Materials Research [1262261] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have investigated the electronic and optical properties of (Sr1-xCax)(2)IrO4 (x = 0-0.375) and (Sr1-yBay)(2)IrO4 (y = 0-0.375) epitaxial thin films, in which the bandwidth is systematically tuned via chemical substitutions of Sr ions by Ca and Ba. Transport measurements indicate that the thin-film series exhibits insulating behavior, similar to the J(eff) = 1/2 spin-orbit Mott insulator Sr2IrO4. As the average A-site ionic radius increases from (Sr1-xCax)(2)IrO4 to (Sr1-yBay)(2)IrO4, optical conductivity spectra in the near-infrared region shift to lower energies, which cannot be explained by the simple picture of well-separated J(eff) = 1/2 and J(eff) = 3/2 bands. We suggest that the two-peak-like optical conductivity spectra of the layered iridates originates from the overlap between the optically forbidden spin-orbit exciton and the intersite optical transitions within the J(eff) = 1/2 band. Our experimental results are consistent with this interpretation as implemented by a multiorbital Hubbard model calculation: namely, incorporating a strong Fano-like coupling between the spin-orbit exciton and intersite d-d transitions within the J(eff) = 1/2 band.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available