4.8 Article

Self-inflicted DNA double-strand breaks sustain tumorigenicity and stemness of cancer cells

Journal

CELL RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 764-783

Publisher

INST BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2017.41

Keywords

sublethal caspase activation; spontaneous DNA double-strand breaks; DNA damage response; ATM activation; cancer stem cells

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA155270, ES024015]
  2. Duke Skin Disease Research Core Center [NIAMS-AR066527]
  3. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [NSFC81120108017, NSFC81572788]
  4. National Cancer Institute [R01CA157216]
  5. National Cancer Institute (Duke Cancer Center Support Grant) [P30CA014236]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are traditionally associated with cancer through their abilities to cause chromosomal instabilities or gene mutations. Here we report a new class of self-inflicted DNA DSBs that can drive tumor growth irrespective of their effects on genomic stability. We discover a mechanism through which cancer cells cause DSBs in their own genome spontaneously independent of reactive oxygen species or replication stress. In this mechanism, low-level cytochrome c leakage from the mitochondria leads to sublethal activation of apoptotic caspases and nucleases, which causes DNA DSBs. In response to these spontaneous DNA DSBs, ATM, a key factor involved in DNA damage response, is constitutively activated. Activated ATM leads to activation of transcription factors NF kappa B and STAT3, known drivers of tumor growth. Moreover, self-inflicted DNA DSB formation and ATM activation are important in sustaining the stemness of patient-derived glioma cells. In human tumor tissues, elevated levels of activated ATM correlate with poor patient survival. Self-inflicted DNA DSBs therefore are functionally important for maintaining the malignancy of cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available