4.8 Article

Introducing Overlapping Grain Boundaries in Chemical Vapor Deposited Hexagonal Boron Nitride Monolayer Films

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 4521-4527

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b08315

Keywords

hexagonal boron nitride; grain boundary; chemical vapor deposition; aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy; 2D materials

Funding

  1. European Union [656214-2DInterFOX, 655760-DIGIPHASE]
  2. EPSRC, UK
  3. Wiener Wissenschafts, Forschungs- and Technologiefond (WWTF) [MA14-009]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [279342]
  5. EPSRC, UK [EP/K016636/1]
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P25721-N20]
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K016636/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/K016636/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P25721] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate the growth of overlapping grain boundaries in continuous, polycrystalline hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) monolayer films via scalable catalytic chemical vapor deposition. Unlike the commonly reported atomically stitched grain boundaries, these overlapping grain boundaries do not consist of defect lines within the monolayer films but are composed of self-sealing bilayer regions of limited width. We characterize this overlapping hBN grain boundary structure in detail by complementary (scanning) transmission electron microscopy techniques and propose a catalytic growth mechanism linked to the subsurface/bulk of the process catalyst and its boron and nitrogen solubilities. Our data suggest that the overlapping grain boundaries are comparatively resilient against deleterious pinhole formation associated with grain boundary defect lines and thus may reduce detrimental breakdown effects when polycrystalline h-BN monolayer films are used as ultrathin dielectrics, barrier layers, or separation membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available