4.3 Article

Glucose availability controls ATF4-mediated MITF suppression to drive melanoma cell growth

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 20, Pages 32946-32959

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16514

Keywords

melanoma; glucose; MITF; ATF4; ROS

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [C11591/A16416]
  2. Miguel Servet contract [CP15/00176]
  3. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitario (FIS) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III-FEDER (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional) [PI16-01911]
  4. MRC [MR/L011840/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Cancer Research UK [16416] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/L011840/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well know that cancer cells have adopted an altered metabolism and that glucose is a major source of energy for these cells. In melanoma, enhanced glucose usage is favoured through the hyper-activated MAPK pathway, which suppresses OXPHOS and stimulates glycolysis. However, it has not been addressed how glucose availability impacts on melanoma specific signaling pathways that drive melanoma cell proliferation. Here we show that melanoma cells are dependent on high glucose levels for efficient growth. Thereby, glucose metabolism controls the expression of the melanoma fate transcription factor MITF, a master regulator of melanoma cell survival and proliferation, invasion and therapy resistance. Restriction of glucose availability to physiological concentrations induces the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Increased ROS levels lead to the up-regulation of AFT4, which in turn suppresses MITF expression by competing with CREB, an otherwise potent inducer of the MITF promoter. Our data give new insight into the complex regulation of MITF, a key regulator of melanoma biology, and support previous findings that link metabolic disorders such as hyperglycemia and diabetes with increased melanoma risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available