4.3 Article

Immunohistochemical Ki67 after short-term hormone therapy identifies low-risk breast cancers as reliably as genomic markers

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages 26122-26128

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15385

Keywords

short-term hormone therapy; IHC Ki67; genomic marker; breast cancer

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [25830101]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25830101] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The purpose of this study was to test whether immunohistochemical (IHC) Ki67 levels after short-term preoperative hormone therapy (post-Ki67) predict similar numbers of patients with favorable prognoses as genomic markers. Results: Thirty paired cases (60 samples) were enrolled in this study. Post-Ki67 levels were significantly lower than pre-treatment Ki67 levels (P < 0.001). PostKi67 predicted more low-risk cases (83.3%, 25/30) than pre-genomic surrogate signature(GSS) (66.7%: 20/30), but the difference in predictive power was not significant (P = 0.233). Proliferation (MKI67, STK15, Survivin, CCNB1, and MYBL2) and estrogen (ER, PGR, BCL2, and SCUBE2) related signatures were significantly downregulated after therapy (P < 0.001 and 0.041, respectively). Materials and Methods: Core needle biopsy specimens of primary breast cancer were collected at Okayama University Hospital from hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative patients that subsequently received two weeks of neoadjuvant hormone therapy. Paired post-treatment specimens from surgical samples were also collected. IHC Ki67 levels and GSS were compared between pre-and post-hormone treatment samples. Changes of gene expression pattern in short-term hormone therapy were also assessed. Conclusions: IHC based post-Ki67 levels may have distinct predictive power compared with the naive IHC Ki67. Future studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods may be needed to validate our results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available