4.8 Article

Why Are Polar Surfaces of ZnO Stable?

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 29, Issue 12, Pages 5306-5320

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01487

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/L000202, EP/I03014X, EP/K038958, EP/K000144]
  2. CON-ACYT
  3. SEP
  4. UJAT
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K038958/1, EP/I03014X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/K038958/1, EP/I03014X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We probe and rationalize the complex surface chemistry of wurtzite ZnO by employing interatomic potential calculations coupled with a Monte Carlo procedure that sampled over 0.5 million local minima. We analyze the structure and stability of the (0001) and (000 (1) over bar) ZnO surfaces, rationalizing previous patterns found in STM images and explaining the (1 x 1) periodicity reported by LEED analysis. The full range of Zn/O surface occupancies was covered for a (5 x 5) supercell, keeping vertical bar m(zn) - m(O)vertical bar/N approximate to 0.24 where m and N are the numbers of occupied surface sites and total surface sites, respectively. Our calculations explain why the (5 x 5) reconstructions seen in some experiments and highlight the importance of completely canceling the inherent dipole of the unreconstructed polar surfaces. The experimentally observed rich reconstruction patterns can be traced from the lowest occupancy, showing the thermodynamically most stable configurations of both polar surfaces. Triangular and striped reconstructions are seen, inter alia, on both polar surfaces, and hexagonal patterns also appear on the O terminated surface. Our results explain the main experimental structures observed on these complex surfaces. Moreover, grand canonical simulations of ZnO polar surfaces reveal that disorder is favored and, thus, configurational entropic factors is the the cause of their stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available