4.5 Article

A Computational Comparison of Oxygen Atom Transfer Catalyzed by Dimethyl Sulfoxide Reductase with Mo and W

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume -, Issue 21, Pages 3580-3589

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201500209

Keywords

Density functional calculations; Molybdenum; Tungsten; Enzyme models

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB932800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21103064, 21473070]
  3. Swedish Research Council [2010-5025]
  4. COST (Action) [CM1003]
  5. International Research Training Group

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A thorough computational study has been performed to investigate oxygen atom transfer (OAT) reactions catalyzed by dimethyl sulfoxide reductase (DMSOR) with a catalytic molybdenum or tungsten ion. Thirteen different density functional theory (DFT) methods have been employed to obtain structural parameters along the reaction pathway, and single-point energies were computed with local correlation coupled-cluster methods [LCCSD(T0)]. For both Mo and W, most DFT methods indicate that the enzyme follows a twostep mechanism with a stable intermediate in which a DMSO molecule coordinates to the metal ion in the +IV oxidation state, and this is also confirmed by the LCCSD(T0) energies. The W-substituted models have a 26-30 kJ/mol lower activation barrier for the OAT reaction, and the reaction is 6370 kJ/mol more exothermic than that with Mo. Different DFT methods give widely different activation and reaction energies, which roughly depend on the amount of exact exchange in the method; these differences are also reflected in the structures, especially for the rate-limiting transition state. Consequently, there is quite a large variation in energies and various energy corrections (thermal, solvation, dispersion, and relativistic; up to 39 kJ/mol) depending on which DFT method is used to obtain the geometries. Therefore, a mechanism predicted by a single method should be viewed with caution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available