4.3 Article

Intratumoral heterogeneity of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages 14957-14968

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14844

Keywords

cholangiocarcinoma; exome sequencing; intratumoral heterogeneity; microsatellite instability; MSH6

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [PE2152/2-1]
  2. young investigator grant
  3. Faculty of Medicine of the Goethe University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

No personalized therapy regimens could demonstrate a benefit in survival of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Since genetic heterogeneity might influence single biopsy based targeted therapy or the outcome of clinical trials, aim of the present study was to investigate intratumoral heterogeneity of iCCA by whole exome sequencing. Therefore, samples from tumor center and tumor periphery of large iCCA lesions as well as a control from healthy liver tissue were obtained from four patients and whole exome sequencing was performed. Mutations that occurred only in the tumor center or periphery were defined as private, whereas mutations present in both samples were regarded as common. A mean of 3 non-synonymous private mutations (range 0-14) per sample compared to 33,3 common mutations per sample (range 24-41) was identified. Mean percentage of non-synonymous private mutations per sample was 12% (range 0-58). In all samples of patient 1-3 as well as the central sample of patient 4 <= 10% private mutations were found, whereas 58% of private mutations were identified in the peripheral sample of patient 4. In this sample a private mutation in the DNA mismatch repair protein MSH6 could be identified most likely causing the high amount of private mutations. No substantial intratumoral heterogeneity was found in copy number variation analysis. In conclusion, iCCA show a small but distinct intratumoral heterogeneity. Somatic mutations in mismatch repair proteins might contribute significantly to increased spatial tumor burden and thereby may influence clinical management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available