4.2 Review

Architecture of the Entorhinal Cortex A Review of Entorhinal Anatomy in Rodents with Some Comparative Notes

Journal

FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00046

Keywords

parahippocampal region; hippocampus; connectivity; primate; rodent

Categories

Funding

  1. Kavli Foundation
  2. Centre of Excellence scheme-Centre for Neural Computation and research of the Research Council of Norway [191929, 227769]
  3. Egil and Pauline Braathen and Fred Kavli Centre for Cortical Microcircuits
  4. National Infrastructure scheme of the Research Council of Norway-NORBRAIN
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [15K18358]
  6. [26119502]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K18358] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The entorhinal cortex (EC) is the major input and output structure of the hippocampal formation, forming the nodal point in cortico-hippocampal circuits. Different division schemes including two or many more subdivisions have been proposed, but here we will argue that subdividing EC into two components, the lateral EC (LEC) and medial EC (MEC) might suffice to describe the functional architecture of EC. This subdivision then leads to an anatomical interpretation of the different phenotypes of LEC and MEC. First, we will briefly summarize the cytoarchitectonic differences and differences in hippocampal projection patterns on which the subdivision between LEC and MEC traditionally is based and provide a short comparative perspective. Second, we focus on main differences in cortical connectivity, leading to the conclusion that the apparent differences may well correlate with the functional differences. Cortical connectivity of MEC is features interactions with areas such as the presubiculum, parasubiculum, retrosplenial cortex (RSC) and postrhinal cortex, all areas that are considered to belong to the spatial processing domain of the cortex. In contrast, LEC is strongly connected with olfactory areas, insular, medial-and orbitofrontal areas and perirhinal cortex. These areas are likely more involved in processing of object information, attention and motivation. Third, we will compare the intrinsic networks involving principal-and inter-neurons in LEC and MEC. Together, these observations suggest that the different phenotypes of both EC subdivisions likely depend on the combination of intrinsic organization and specific sets of inputs. We further suggest a reappraisal of the notion of EC as a layered input-output structure for the hippocampal formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available