4.6 Review

Colloidal aspects of Janus-like hairy cellulose nanocrystalloids

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN COLLOID & INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 21-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2017.02.001

Keywords

Soft nanoparticles; Colloidal properties; Nanocelluloses; Hairy cellulose nanocrystals; Electrosteric interactions

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  2. FPInnovations
  3. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Nature et technology (FRQNT, Quebec, Canada)
  4. Centre for Self-Assembled Chemical Structures (CSACS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For decades, cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) have been produced by hydrolyzing the disordered cellulose chains of hierarchical fiber structures. These colloidal particles comprise highly ordered arrays of cellulose chains, impeding the physicochemical modifications of inner crystalline layers, which in turn restrict key colloidal properties, such as dispersion stability, functionalizability and charge, response to external fields, and transportation. Controlled oxidation of fibrils permits the partial disintegration of amorphous cellulose chains while maintaining contact with the crystalline body, yielding Janus-like nanoparticles with a needle-shaped crystalline body sandwiched between two disordered cellulose regions (hairs). We refer to these nanoparticles as hairy cellulose nanocrystalloids (HCNC). The protruding soft biopolymer brushes impart significant modifications to the colloidal properties of cellulose nanocrystals, promoting their functionality, charge, stability, and self-assembly. In this article, we embark on detailing how HCNCs behave more like soft nanoparticles as compared to rigid CNCs, explain their fundamental colloidal aspects, and provide a mechanistic overview on how HCNC may expand the horizon of next generation natural soft materials. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available