4.7 Article

Faster Aspart Versus Insulin Aspart as Part of a Basal-Bolus Regimen in Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: The onset 2 Trial

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 951-957

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc16-1770

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk A/S
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. Eli Lilly
  5. Janssen
  6. Merck
  7. Novo Nordisk
  8. Sanofi
  9. Takeda
  10. Amari
  11. Amgen
  12. Lilly
  13. Lexicon
  14. Abbott
  15. BD
  16. Biodel
  17. DexCom
  18. GlaxoSmithKline
  19. Insulet
  20. MannKind
  21. Medtronic
  22. Pfizer
  23. Valeritas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE This multicenter, double-blind, treat-to-target, phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) versus insulin aspart (IAsp) in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving basal insulin and oral antidiabetic agents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The primary end point was HbA(1c) change from baseline after 26 weeks' treatment. After an 8-week run-in to optimize basal insulin, subjects were randomized (1:1) to mealtime faster aspart (n=345) or IAsp(n =344), titrated using a simple daily patient-driven algorithm, plus insulin glargine U100 and metformin. RESULTS HbA(1c) change was -1.38% (faster aspart) and -1.36% (IAsp); mean HbA(1c) was 6.6% for both groups. Faster aspart demonstrated noninferiority versus IAsp in reducing HbA(1c) (estimated treatment difference [ETD] [95% CI] -0.02% [-0.15; 0.10]). Both treatments improved postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) control; the PPG increment (liquid meal test) was statistically significant in favor of faster aspart after 1 h (ETD [95% CI] -0.59 mmol/L [-1.09; -0.09]; -10.63mg/dL [-19.56; -1.69]; P=0.0198), but not after 2-4 h. Change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, body weight, and overall severe/blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycemia rates (rate ratio [RR] [95% CI] 1.09 [0.88; 1.36]) were similar between treatments. Postmeal hypoglycemia (022 h) rates were 2.27 (faster aspart) and 1.49 (IAsp) per patient-year of exposure (RR [95% CI] 1.60 [1.13; 2.27]). CONCLUSIONS Faster aspart and IAsp were confirmed noninferior in a basal-bolus regimen regarding change from baseline in HbA(1c). Faster aspart improved 1-h PPG with no differences in 224-h PPG versus IAsp. Overall hypoglycemia rates were similar except for an increase in 022-h postmeal hypoglycemia with faster aspart.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available