4.7 Article

Defining epithelial cell dynamics and lineage relationships in the developing lacrimal gland

Journal

DEVELOPMENT
Volume 144, Issue 13, Pages 2517-2528

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.150789

Keywords

Lacrimal gland; Epithelia; Single cell sequencing; Development; Tubulogenesis

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute [1R01EY026492-01, 5F32EY025139-02]
  2. National Cancer Institute [1U19CA179513]
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. MRC [MR/K017047/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/K017047/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The tear-producing lacrimal gland is a tubular organ that protects and lubricates the ocular surface. The lacrimal gland possesses many features that make it an excellent model in which to investigate tubulogenesis, but the cell types and lineage relationships that drive lacrimal gland formation are unclear. Using single-cell sequencing and other molecular tools, we reveal novel cell identities and epithelial lineage dynamics that underlie lacrimal gland development. We show that the lacrimal gland from its earliest developmental stages is composed of multiple subpopulations of immune, epithelial and mesenchymal cell lineages. The epithelial lineage exhibits the most substantial cellular changes, transitioning through a series of unique transcriptional states to become terminally differentiated acinar, ductal and myoepithelial cells. Furthermore, lineage tracing in postnatal and adult glands provides the first direct evidence of unipotent KRT5(+) epithelial cells in the lacrimal gland. Finally, we show conservation of developmental markers between the developing mouse and human lacrimal gland, supporting the use of mice to understand human development. Together, our data reveal crucial features of lacrimal gland development that have broad implications for understanding epithelial organogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available