4.3 Article

Overexpression of stathmin plays a pivotal role in the metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 37, Pages 61742-61760

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18687

Keywords

stathmin; integrina5 beta 1; FAK; ERK; ESCC

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81372385, 81572365, 81372591, 91629105]
  2. State Key Project for Basic Research of China [2014BAI09B07, 2016YFC0901400, 2014CBA02002]
  3. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences [2016-I2M-1-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a serious malignant tumor that affects human health. We analyzed the correlation between serum stathmin level and ESCC and elucidated the molecular mechanisms of stathmin's promotion of ESCC cell invasion and metastasis. Methods: Stathmin level in ESCC and healthy control serum were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the clinical parameters were analyzed. We established ESCC cells with stathmin overexpression or knockdown and then evaluated the effects of stathmin on invasion and metastasis in ESCC. Differentially expressed genes were analyzed by Human Transcriptome Array and confirmed by RT-PCR. The expression levels of the integrin family, focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) were detected by immunoblotting. Results: Serum levels of stathmin were significantly higher in ESCC than in control serum and associated with lymph node metastasis, tumor stage and size. Furthermore, we found that stathmin promoted migration and invasion of ESCC cells in vitro and in vivo. In addition, we confirmed that the activation of the integrina5 beta 1/FAK/ERK pathway is increased in stathmin-overexpression cells and accelerates cell motility by enhancing cell adhesion ability. Conclusion: Stathmin may predict a potential metastasis biomarker for ESCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available