4.7 Article

Enhanced ethanol production from mild alkali-treated oil-palm empty fruit bunches via co-fermentation of glucose and xylose

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 113-123

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.039

Keywords

Co-fermentation; Bioethanol; Alkali-pre-treatment; Xylose fermentation; Oil palm empty fruit bunches; Co-hydrolysis

Funding

  1. Universiti Sains Malaysia through Research University (RU) Grant [1001-PTEKIND/821067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poor or non-utilisation of the xylose fractions of lignocellulosic biomass is a serious impediment to the achievement of energy security through lignocellulosic ethanol. In this work, the potential of sustainable ethanol production from oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB) by co-fermentation of its glucose and xylose components was assessed. Simultaneous co-saccharification and co-fermentation (SScF) was compared with three other fermentation techniques to evaluate bioconversion of mild-alkaline-treated OPEFB for efficient bioethanol production. Hydrolysis was done by the synergistic actions of commercial cellulase (50 FPU/gds) supplemented with on-site crude hemicellulasd at unit ratio of 1 FPU: 5 U. After pre-treatment, 79.0% and 79.3% respectively of total glucan and xylan were recovered while 91.9% and 90.6% of the respective polymers were hydrolyzed to fermentable sugars. At 3.4% (w/v) substrate loading, 89.5% theoretical ethanol yield, equivalent of 0.33 g/g raw OPEFB (418.9 L/tonne) was achieved by using SScF. This was higher than 84.9% (031 g/g = 397.6 L/tonne raw OPEFB) achieved by separate cohydrolysis and co-fermentation (SHcF) which is the closest among other fermentation techniques compared. By our knowledge, the yield achieved by the co-fermentation techniques used in this study has not been reported in any previous research which produced ethanol from OPEFB. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available