4.3 Review

Three-dimensional printing in cardiology: Current applications and future challenges

Journal

CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 436-444

Publisher

VIA MEDICA
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0056

Keywords

three-dimensional printing; cardiology; preoperative evaluation; device design; medical education

Funding

  1. Henan Provincial Key Medical Program (Henan Provincial Department of Science and Technology)
  2. Henan Provincial New Medical Technology Program (Health and Family Planning Commission of Henan Province)
  3. Medical University of Gdansk, Poalnd

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has attracted a huge interest in recent years. Broadly speaking, it refers to the technology which converts a predesigned virtual model to a touchable object. In clinical medicine, it usually converts a series of two-dimensional medical images acquired through computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or 3D echocardiography into a physical model. Medical 3D printing consists of three main steps: image acquisition, virtual reconstruction and 3D manufacturing. It is a promising tool for preoperative evaluation, medical device design, hemodynamic simulation and medical education, it is also likely to reduce operative risk and increase operative success. However, the most relevant studies are case reports or series which are underpowered in testing its actual effect on patient outcomes. The decision of making a 3D cardiac model may seem arbitrary since it is mostly based on a cardiologist's perceived difficulty in performing an interventional procedure. A uniform consensus is urgently necessary to standardize the key steps of 3D printing from imaging acquisition to final production. In the future, more clinical trials of rigorous design are possible to further validate the effect of 3D printing on the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available