4.7 Review

Applicant Perspectives During Selection: A Review Addressing So What?, What's New?, and Where to Next?

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 1693-1725

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0149206316681846

Keywords

applicant reactions to selection; selection/staffing; job search; justice/fairness; recruitment

Funding

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [435-2015-0220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We provide a comprehensive but critical review of research on applicant reactions to selection procedures published since 2000 (n = 145), when the last major review article on applicant reactions appeared in the Journal of Management. We start by addressing the main criticisms levied against the field to determine whether applicant reactions matter to individuals and employers (So what?). This is followed by a consideration of What's new? by conducting a comprehensive and detailed review of applicant reaction research centered upon four areas of growth: expansion of the theoretical lens, incorporation of new technology in the selection arena, internationalization of applicant reactions research, and emerging boundary conditions. Our final section focuses on Where to next? and offers an updated and integrated conceptual model of applicant reactions, four key challenges, and eight specific future research questions. Our conclusion is that the field demonstrates stronger research designs, with studies incorporating greater control, broader constructs, and multiple time points. There is also solid evidence that applicant reactions have significant and meaningful effects on attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. At the same time, we identify some remaining gaps in the literature and a number of critical questions that remain to be explored, particularly in light of technological and societal changes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available