4.3 Review

The serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and hip fracture risk: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 24, Pages 39849-39858

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16337

Keywords

serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D; hip fracture; meta-analysis; dose-response

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81501933, 81372014]
  2. Wenzhou Science and Technology Project [Y20160369]
  3. National Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of China [201510343002]
  4. Xinmiao talent plan of Zhejiang Province [2015R413005, 2016R413060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hip fracture has increasingly become a social and economic burden. The relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and the risk of hip fracture reported by previous studies remains controversial. We searched Pubmed and Embase to identify studies reporting the relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of hip fracture. Fifteen prospective cohort studies with a total of 51239 participants and 3386 hip fracture cases were included. By pooling the Relative Risk of the lowest vs. the highest categories indicated that lower levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D were more likely to be a risk factor for hip fracture with adjusted Relative Risk (95% Confidence Interval) of 1.58 (1.41, 1.77). Subgroup meta-analysis examining the stability of the primary results achieved the same results. A dose-response meta-analysis showed that the risk of hip fracture was a descending curve below the line of RR=1. The descending trend was obvious when serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were less than 60 nmol/L and was flat when serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were more than 60 nmol/L. We found that individuals with low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D have an increased risk of hip fracture, and this effect was evident when the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were less than 60 nmol/L.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available