4.3 Review

Concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy could improve survival outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis based on random clinical trials

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages 20410-20417

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14669

Keywords

neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy; esophageal cancer; overall survival; R0 resection rate; progression-free survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The long-term survival benefit of concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer remains controversial. In the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess these effectiveness. Methods: We searched for most relevant studies published up to the end of August 2016, using Pubmed and web of knowledge. And additional articles were identified from previous meta-analysis. The hazard ratio (HR, for overall survival and progression free survival) or risk ratio (RR, for R0 resection) with its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the pooled effect. Results: Twelve articles including 1756 patients were included in the metaanalysis. Concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery was associated with significantly improved overall survival (HR=0.76, 95% CI=0.680.86), progression survival (HR =0.69, 95% CI=0.59-0.81), and R0 resection rate(RR =1.17, 95% CI=1.03-1.33). Subgroup analysis suggested that concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy could improve overall survival outcome for squamous cell carcinoma (HR=0.73, 95% CI=0.61-0.88) but not those for adenocarcinoma (HR=0.72, 95% CI=0.48-1.04). Conclusion: Our findings suggested that concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available