4.5 Article

A powerful and efficient two-stage method for detecting gene-to-gene interactions in GWAS

Journal

BIOSTATISTICS
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 477-494

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw060

Keywords

Genetic interactions; Epistasis; Two-stage testing; Case-control design; Parkinson's disease

Funding

  1. Project 3.7.3 (Statistical Genetics) of the Center for Medical Systems Biology of the Netherlands Genomics Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For over a decade functional gene-to-gene interaction (epistasis) has been suspected to be a determinant in the missing heritability of complex traits. However, searching for epistasis on the genome-wide scale has been challenging due to the prohibitively large number of tests which result in a serious loss of statistical power as well as computational challenges. In this article, we propose a two-stage method applicable to existing case-control data sets, which aims to lessen both of these problems by pre-assessing whether a candidate pair of genetic loci is involved in epistasis before it is actually tested for interaction with respect to a complex phenotype. The pre-assessment is based on a two-locus genotype independence test performed in the sample of cases. Only the pairs of loci that exhibit non-equilibrium frequencies are analyzed via a logistic regression score test, thereby reducing the multiple testing burden. Since only the computationally simple independence tests are performed for all pairs of loci while the more demanding score tests are restricted to the most promising pairs, genome-wide association study (GWAS) for epistasis becomes feasible. By design our method provides strong control of the type I error. Its favourable power properties especially under the practically relevant misspecification of the interaction model are illustrated. Ready-to-use software is available. Using the method we analyzed Parkinson's disease in four cohorts and identified possible interactions within several SNP pairs in multiple cohorts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available