4.3 Article

Relationship Between Urinary Nitrate Excretion and Blood Pressure in the InChianti Cohort

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 707-712

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpx035

Keywords

blood pressure; diet; hypertension; nitrate

Funding

  1. NHS small grant - Royal Devon
  2. Exeter Hospital Research and Development department
  3. NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility
  4. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2011-23-001] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Inorganic nitrate from the oxidation of endogenously synthesized nitric oxide (NO) or consumed in the diet can be reduced to NO via a complex enterosalivary circulation pathway. The relationship between total nitrate exposure by measured urinary nitrate excretion and blood pressure in a large population sample has not been assessed previously. METHODS For this cross-sectional study, 24-hour urinary nitrate excretion was measured by spectrophotometry in the 919 participants from the InChianti cohort at baseline and blood pressure measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer. RESULTS After adjusting for age and sex only, diastolic blood pressure was 1.9 mm Hg lower in subjects with >= 2 mmol urinary nitrate excretion compared with those excreting <1 mmol nitrate in 24 hours: systolic blood pressure was 3.4 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI): -3.5 to -0.4) lower in subjects for the same comparison. Effect sizes in fully adjusted models (for age, sex, potassium intake, use of antihypertensive medications, diabetes, HS-CRP, or current smoking status) were marginally larger: systolic blood pressure in the >= 2 mmol urinary nitrate excretion group was 3.9 (CI: -7.1 to -0.7) mm Hg lower than in the comparison <1 mmol excretion group. CONCLUSIONS Modest differences in total nitrate exposure are associated with lower blood pressure. These differences are at least equivalent to those seen from substantial (100 mmol) reductions in sodium intake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available