4.7 Article

Electrochemical synthesis of three-dimensional porous reduced graphene oxide film: Preparation and in vitro osteogenic activity evaluation

Journal

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 150-158

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.04.012

Keywords

Reduced graphene oxide; Electrochemical deposition; Scaffold; Biocompatible; Bone regeneration

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81601613]
  2. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [16JCZDJC32800]
  3. Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [A2016394]
  4. Science & Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province [2016FZ0085, 2015SZ0078]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide (3D-rGO) porous films were fabricated using a two-step electrochemical method, including an electrochemical deposition process for the self-assembly of GO and an electrochemical bubbling-based transfer. The morphology, physical properties, and phase composition of the 3D-rGO films were characterized, and the cellular bioactivities were evaluated using pre-osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1 cells). The attachment, proliferation and differentiation of the MC3T3-E1 cells on the 3D-rGO films was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays and live/dead cell staining, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assays, respectively. The expression of osteogenic-related genes in MC3T3-E1 cells was evaluated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The results showed that the 3D-rGO films supported cell viability and proliferation, as well as significantly enhanced ALP activity and osteogenic-related genes (ALP, OPN, Runx2) expressions. Our findings indicate the promising potential of the 3D-rGO porous films for bone tissue engineering. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available