4.3 Article

Association between polymorphism within interleukin related genes and Graves' disease: a meta-analysis of 22 case-control studies

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 58, Pages 98993-99002

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20114

Keywords

Graves' disease; interleukin; polymorphism; susceptibility; case/control study

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81500796, 81500620]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graves' disease (GD) is a common autoimmune disorder with a genetic predisposition. There is strong evidence to suggest that both Th1 and Th2 circulating cytokines are involved in the development of GD. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the impact of seven variations of five IL-related genes on the susceptibility to GD. A total of 22 case-control studies involving 5338 GD patients and 6446 healthy controls were included. The results showed that only one SNP rs1800795 in IL-6 was significantly associated with GD in homozygous model (CC vs. GG: OR = 2.714, 95% CI = 1.047-7.039, p = 0.04), heterozygous model (CG vs. GG: OR = 1.295, 95% CI = 1.013-1.655, p = 0.039), dominant model (CC+ CG vs. GG: OR = 1.418, 95% CI = 1.122-1.793, p = 0.003) and additive model (C vs. G: OR = 1.432, 95% CI = 1.087-1.886, p = 0.011). To explain the heterogeneity, we performed the subgroup analysis by ethnicity. The ethnicity stratification revealed that the association between rs1800795 and GD tended to be much stronger for Asian than European population in homozygous, dominant, recessive, and additive models. The remaining 6 SNPs in 4 genes did not show any significant association with GD in any genetic models. Together, our data support that rs1800795 within the IL-6 gene confers genetic susceptibility for GD. Future large-scale studies are required to validate the associations between IL-6 and others IL-related genes and GD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available