4.8 Article

JetValve: Rapid manufacturing of biohybrid scaffolds for biomimetic heart valve replacement

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages 229-241

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.033

Keywords

Heart valve; Rotary Jet Spinning; Biohybrid; Nanofiber; Tissue engineering; Rapid manufacture

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation under NSF [1541959]
  2. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) from Los Alamos National Laboratory under a prime DTRA [312659, DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  3. National Institutes of Health [UH3TR000522]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tissue engineered scaffolds have emerged as a promising solution for heart valve replacement because of their potential for regeneration. However, traditional heart valve tissue engineering has relied on resource-intensive, cell-based manufacturing, which increases cost and hinders clinical translation. To overcome these limitations, in situ tissue engineering approaches aim to develop scaffold materials and manufacturing processes that elicit endogenous tissue remodeling and repair. Yet despite recent advances in synthetic materials manufacturing, there remains a lack of cell-free, automated approaches for rapidly producing biomimetic heart valve scaffolds. Here, we designed a jet spinning process for the rapid and automated fabrication of fibrous heart valve scaffolds. The composition, multiscale architecture, and mechanical properties of the scaffolds were tailored to mimic that of the native leaflet fibrosa and assembled into three dimensional, semilunar valve structures. We demonstrated controlled modulation of these scaffold parameters and show initial biocompatibility and functionality in vitro. Valves were minimally-invasively deployed via transapical access to the pulmonary valve position in an ovine model and shown to be functional for 15 h. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available