4.7 Article

Ecological risk assessment of imidacloprid applied to experimental rice fields: Accurateness of the RICEWQ model and effects on ecosystem structure

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages 431-440

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.04.045

Keywords

Neonicotinoid; Fate modelling; Ecological risk assessment; Rice

Funding

  1. Portuguese government through the Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) [UID/AGR/04129/2013, PTDC/AGR-AAM/105459/2008, SFRH/BD/89098/2012, SFRH/BPD/109199/2015]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/109199/2015, PTDC/AGR-AAM/105459/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fate of imidacloprid and its potential side-effects on biological communities and ecosystem functioning was studied in experimental rice plots. In addition, the influence of applying a withholding period of zero days (actual practices) and seven days (recommended in EU) on this was evaluated. Predicted environmental concentrations (PEC) of imidacloprid calculated with the higher-tier model RICEWQ agreed well with concentrations measured in the field. Methodologies generally used in the EU and USA for lower-tier PEC calculation, however, severely underestimated actual field concentrations and hence appear to need further evaluation and eventually amendments. Effects on several biological communities (especially ostracods, dipterans and coleopterans) were noted following imidacloprid application, with greatest effects in the paddy were as applied a withholding period of 7 days. An increase in the density of snails (Physa acuta), however, may have prevented effects on ecosystem functioning through functional redundancy. Implications of study findings for the ecological risk assessment of imidacloprid and potential mitigation measures are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available