4.3 Article

APOBEC-mediated mutagenesis in urothelial carcinoma is associated with improved survival, mutations in DNA damage response genes, and immune response

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 4537-4548

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23344

Keywords

urinary bladder neoplasms; APOBEC Deaminases; mutagenesis; DNA damage; interferon

Funding

  1. Veterans Health Administration Merit grant [BX0033692-01]
  2. John P. Hanson Foundation for Cancer Research at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

APOBEC enzymes are responsible for a mutation signature (TCW>T/G) implicated in a wide variety of tumors. We explore the APOBEC mutational signature in bladder cancer and the relationship with specific mutations, molecular subtype, gene expression, and survival using sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 395), Beijing Genomics Institute (n = 99), and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. Tumors were split into APOBEC-high and APOBEC-low based on APOBEC enrichment. Patients with APOBEC-high tumors have better overall survival compared to those with APOBEC-low tumors (38.2 vs. 18.5 months, p = 0.005). APOBEC-high tumors are more likely to have mutations in DNA damage response genes (TP53, ATR, BRCA2) and chromatin regulatory genes (ARID1A, MLL, MLL3), while APOBEC-low tumors are more likely to have mutations in FGFR3 and KRAS. APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B expression correlates with mutation burden, regardless of bladder tumor molecular subtype. APOBEC mutagenesis is associated with increased expression of immune signatures, including interferon signaling, and expression of APOBEC3B is increased after stimulation of APOBEC-high bladder cancer cell lines with IFN gamma. In summary, APOBEC-high tumors are more likely to have mutations in DNA damage response and chromatin regulatory genes, potentially providing more substrate for APOBEC enzymes, leading to a hypermutational phenotype and the subsequent enhanced immune response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available