4.7 Article

Crystal-chemistry control of the mechanical properties of 2:1 clay minerals

Journal

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages 387-398

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.04.010

Keywords

Clay minerals; Ductility; Elasticity; Hardness; Interlayer interactions; Nanoindentation

Funding

  1. Royal Dutch Shell and Schlumberger through the MIT X-Shale Hub
  2. Concrete Sustainability Hub (C-S-Hub) at MIT
  3. Portland Cement Association (PCA)
  4. RMC Research and Education Foundation
  5. A*MIDEX projects [ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clay minerals are the main constituents of the clay matrix of a wide variety of sedimentary deposits. When subjected to burial, some of these minerals undergo phase transitions accompanied by atomic substitutions which ultimately impact the cohesive interactions between their constitutive layers. The most common among such transitions is smectite illitization, which is also highly relevant for oil and gas exploration and production from source rocks. The impact of this transition on the mechanical properties of clay minerals as well as clay bearing rocks remains, however, to be properly addressed. To this end, a set of macroscopic single 2:1 clay minerals (pyrophyllite, talc, vermiculite, phlogopite, muscovite, and clintonite) representative of the two octahedral fillings and the variation in surface charge densities was investigated. A hybrid experimental modeling approach is proposed, which combines nanoindentation in orthogonal directions (x1 and x3 directions) with analytical derivations of the cohesive energy (U-i) using XRD and TEM-EDS measurements. The results highlight that the interlayer energy defines the elasticity (modulus M), strength (hardness H) and ductility behavior (M/H) of these materials; and not the bond energy stored into the constituent layers. This finding permits the derivation of predictive stiffness and strength functional relations as derivatives of the interlayer energy that account for the arrangement of nanoscale layers and the interlayer composition. These relations suggest that as the cohesion increases with the coulombic interactions through progressive smectite illitization, the system loses its capacity to dissipate applied energy by dislocation mechanisms in between the layers, entailing an increase in brittleness of the clay particles with burial. By way of conclusion, the geophysics and geochemistry implications of these results for predicting the macroscopic mechanical performance of clay bearing geomaterials, such as economically valuable source rocks, are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available