Journal
CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 225-235Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-015-9404-0
Keywords
Generalized linear model; Robust statistics; Heteroscedasticity; Skewness; Continuous outcomes
Categories
Funding
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Some researchers in psychology have ordinarily relied on traditional linear models when assessing the relationship between predictor(s) and a continuous outcome, even when the assumptions of the traditional model (e.g., normality, homoscedasticity) are not satisfied. Of those who abandon the traditional linear model, some opt for robust versions of the ANOVA and regression statistics that usually focus on relationships for the typical or average case instead of trying to model relationships for the full range of relevant cases. Generalized linear models, on the other hand, model the relationships among variables using all available and relevant data and can be appropriate under certain conditions of non-normality and heteroscedasticity. In this paper, we summarize the advantages and limitations of using generalized linear models with continuous outcomes and provide two simplified examples that highlight the methodology involved in selecting, comparing, and interpreting models for positively skewed outcomes and certain heteroscedastic relationships.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available