4.7 Article

An Innovative Method for Monitoring Food Quality and the Healthfulness of Consumers' Grocery Purchases

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu9050457

Keywords

household food environment; informatics; USDA databases; Healthy Eating Index; Dietary Guidelines for Americans; methodology; nutrition assessment

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture's Agriculture and Food Research Initiative [2015-09151]
  2. NIH from the National Library of Medicine [T15-LM007124]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a method laying the groundwork for systematically monitoring food quality and the healthfulness of consumers' point-of-sale grocery purchases. The method automates the process of identifying United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Patterns Equivalent Database (FPED) components of grocery food items. The input to the process is the compact abbreviated descriptions of food items that are similar to those appearing on the point-of-sale sales receipts of most food retailers. The FPED components of grocery food items are identified using Natural Language Processing techniques combined with a collection of food concept maps and relationships that are manually built using the USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, the What We Eat In America food categories, and the hierarchical organization of food items used by many grocery stores. We have established the construct validity of the method using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, but further evaluation of validity and reliability will require a large-scale reference standard with known grocery food quality measures. Here we evaluate the method's utility in identifying the FPED components of grocery food items available in a large sample of retail grocery sales data (similar to 190 million transaction records).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available