4.5 Article

Speech Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants: The Effects of Working Memory, Phonological Sensitivity, and Aging

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 1046-1061

Publisher

AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC
DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0119

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [R01 DC-000633, R01 DC006237]
  2. Triological Society
  3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation
  4. Acoustical Society of America
  5. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR001070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Models of speech recognition suggest that top-down linguistic and cognitive functions, such as use of phonotactic constraints and working memory, facilitate recognition under conditions of degradation, such as in noise. The question addressed in this study was what happens to these functions when a listener who has experienced years of hearing loss obtains a cochlear implant. Method: Thirty adults with cochlear implants and 30 age-matched controls with age-normal hearing underwent testing of verbal working memory using digit span and serial recall of words. Phonological capacities were assessed using a lexical decision task and nonword repetition. Recognition of words in sentences in speech-shaped noise was measured. Results: Implant users had only slightly poorer working memory accuracy than did controls and only on serial recall of words; however, phonological sensitivity was highly impaired. Working memory did not facilitate speech recognition in noise for either group. Phonological sensitivity predicted sentence recognition for implant users but not for listeners with normal hearing. Conclusion: Clinical speech recognition outcomes for adult implant users relate to the ability of these users to process phonological information. Results suggest that phonological capacities may serve as potential clinical targets through rehabilitative training. Such novel interventions may be particularly helpful for older adult implant users.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available