4.1 Article

Advanced Model Predictive Feedforward/Feedback Control of a Tablet Press

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 110-123

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12247-017-9276-y

Keywords

MPC; PID; Feedforward control; Feedback control; Tablet press; Continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center on Structured Organic Particulate Systems [NSF-ECC 0540855]
  2. Rutgers Research Council [202342 RC-17]
  3. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [11695471]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing, real-time precise control of critical quality attributes (CQAs) is necessary for quality by design (QbD)-based manufacturing and real-time release (RTR) with minimum consumption of time, space, and resources. Pharmaceutical tablets can be produced through different routes with a common tablet press unit operation always placed at the end of the manufacturing process. Therefore, the tablet press is a crucial unit operation directly influencing the CQAs irrespective of manufacturing routes. Despite this, little attention has been paid to the development of an advanced efficient control system for the tablet press. Process modeling can be used as an efficient virtual experimentation tool to design, compare, and evaluate different control systems. We developed a model in Simulink (Mathworks) that includes two master control loops for tablet weight and hardness and a slave feedback loop controlling the compaction force applied to each tablet. We examined the performance of different control strategies based on proportional integral derivative (PID) control and model predictive control (MPC), as well as feedforward/feedback control. We found that a hybrid MPC-PID control strategy outperforms the PID-only control strategy. We also observed that the addition of a feedforward controller further improves the performance of the hybrid MPC-PID control strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available