4.5 Article

Transcription factor co-occupied regions in the murine genome constitute T-helper-cell subtype-specific enhancers

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 11, Pages 3150-3157

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201545713

Keywords

Enhancer; Meta-analysis; STAT; Th-cell; Transcription factor

Categories

Funding

  1. e:Bio - Innovationswettbewerb Systembiologie program from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  2. DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [SFB 650]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transcription factors (TFs) regulate cell-type-specific gene expression programs by combinatorial binding to cis-genomic elements, particularly enhancers, subsequently leading to the recruitment of cofactors, and the general transcriptional machinery to target genes. Using data integration of genome-wide TF binding profiles, we defined regions with combinatorial binding of lineage-specific master TFs (T-BET, GATA3, and ROR-gamma t) and STATs (STAT1 and STAT4, STAT6, and STAT3) in murine T helper (Th) 1, Th2, and Th17 cells, respectively. Stringently excluding promoter regions, we revealed precise genomic elements which were preferentially associated with the enhancer marks p300 and H3K4me1. Furthermore, closely adjacent TF co-occupied regions constituted larger enhancer domains in the respective Th-cell subset (177 in Th1, 141 in Th2, and 266 in Th17 cells) with characteristics of so-called super-enhancers. Importantly, 89% of these super-enhancer regions were Th-cell subtype-specific. Genes associated with super-enhancers, including relevant Th-cell genes (such as Ifng in Th1, Il13 in Th2, and Il17a in Th17 cells), showed strong transcriptional activity. Altogether, the discovered catalog of enhancers provides information about crucial Th-cell subtype-specific regulatory hubs, which will be useful for revealing cell-type-specific gene regulation processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available