4.8 Review

RNA Biomarkers: Diagnostic and Prognostic Potentials and Recent Developments of Electrochemical Biosensors

Journal

SMALL METHODS
Volume 1, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.201700131

Keywords

detection of RNA; diagnostic and prognostic roles of RNA; electrochemical RNA biosensors; nanotechnology; RNA biomarkers

Funding

  1. NHMRC CDF [APP1088966]
  2. Griffith University
  3. University of Wollongong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ribonucleic acids (RNAs) are considered as effective and minimally invasive biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis due to their critical role in the regulation of different cellular processes. Over the past several years, the rapid progress in RNA biomarker research has resulted in the development of a large number of high-performance RNA-detection methods. Most of these methods are based on molecular-biology techniques such as quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), microarrays, and RNA sequencing. In recent years, considerable attention has also been dedicated to developing RNA biosensors, exploiting micro-and nanofabrication technologies, and various readout strategies, including electrochemical and optical transducers. Here, the recent developments of RNA biosensors are concisely reviewed with a special emphasis on electrochemical-detection approaches. The following points are also highlighted: i) all the types of clinically relevant RNAs (mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs) and their diagnostic and prognostic potential in cancer are outlined, ii) major challenges associated with current techniques are identified, followed by a critical analysis of how these challenges have been addressed by different biosensing approaches, and iii) the current requirements that still need to be met for effective screening of RNA biomarkers in both research and clinical settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available