4.3 Article

Cognitive Associates of Current and More Intensive Control of Hypertension: Findings From the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 624-631

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpx023

Keywords

antihypertensive treatment; blood pressure; blood pressure control; cognition; hypertension; HCHS/SOL; Hispanics/Latinos

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [N01-HC65233]
  2. University of Miami [N01-HC65234]
  3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine [N01-HC65235]
  4. Northwestern University [N01-HC65236]
  5. San Diego State University [N01-HC65237]
  6. National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  7. National Institute of Deafness and Other Communications Disorders
  8. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
  9. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  10. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  11. Office of Dietary Supplements
  12. NIA [K01-AG040192]
  13. [AG48642]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Hypertension control in Hispanics/Latinos lag behind general US trends by 10-15%. Intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) management <120 mm Hg may significantly reduce morbidity/mortality risk in adults with hypertension; less is known about cognition. We investigated cross-sectional associations of cognition with observed hypertension control at currently recommended (SBP < 140 mm Hg) and more intensive (SBP < 120 mm Hg) levels using baseline data from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. METHODS From this multicenter cohort study, we focused on 1,735 Hispanic/Latino men and women ages 45-74 years with hypertension and verified antihypertensive use. Verbal fluency, information processing speed, learning, and memory were tested in Spanish or English. RESULTS Separate linear regressions revealed that being on 1 vs. > 1 antihypertensive medication was not associated with cognition; however, individuals with SBP controlled to currently recommended levels outperformed individuals with uncontrolled SBP on verbal fluency [Beta = 1.44 (0.52), P < 0.01] and information processing speed [Beta = 3.01 (0.89), P < 0.001] in age-adjusted regression analyses; only information processing speed remained significant (P < 0.05) after additional adjustments including acculturation, health insurance, and other cardiovascular disease risk factors. When regrouping individuals based on more intensive SBP control, individuals with levels < 120 mm Hg outperformed individuals with higher SBP on verbal fluency regardless of adjustments (P < 0.01). More intensive rather than currently recommended levels of control associated with higher verbal fluency performance regardless of adjustments (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Individual cognitive test scores related to distinct SBP management with more intensive management appearing more robust against confounders. While cognitive associations with hypertension in Hispanics/Latinos may be multifactorial, different levels of SBP control should be considered in future prospective intervention studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available