4.5 Article

Effects of copy number variable regions on local gene expression in white blood cells of Mexican Americans

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 1229-1235

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.280

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK47482, DK70746, DK053889, HL045222, RR013556, MH059490, HL80149]
  2. Department of Defense [DOD PC081025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Only few systematic studies on the contribution of copy number variation to gene expression variation have been published to date. Here we identify effects of copy number variable regions (CNVRs) on nearby gene expression by investigating 909 CNVRs and expression levels of 12059 nearby genes in white blood cells from Mexican-American participants of the San Antonio Family Heart Study. We empirically evaluate our ability to detect the contribution of CNVs to proximal gene expression (presumably in cis) at various window sizes (up to a 10Mb distance) between the gene and CNV. We found a similar to 1-Mb window size to be optimal for capturing cis effects of CNVs. Up to 10% of the CNVs in this study were found to be significantly associated with the expression of at least one gene within their vicinity. As expected, we find that CNVs that directly overlap gene sequences have the largest effects on gene expression (compared with non-overlapping CNVRs located nearby), with positive correlation (except for a few exceptions) between estimated genomic dosage and expression level. We find that genes whose expression level is significantly influenced by nearby CNVRs are enriched for immunity and autoimmunity related genes. These findings add to the currently limited catalog of CNVRs that are recognized as expression quantitative trait loci, and have implications for future study designs as well as for prioritizing candidate causal variants in genomic regions associated with disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available