4.6 Article

Body Topography Parcellates Human Sensory and Motor Cortex

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 3790-3805

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx026

Keywords

embodiment; hand-face border; parcellation; plasticity; septa

Categories

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. CBBS-ScienceCampus [Aktenzeichen: SAS-2015_LIN_LWC]
  3. Helmholtz Alliance ICEMED-Imaging and Curing Environmental Metabolic Diseases
  4. Marie Sklodowska-Curie international reintegration grant
  5. Human Connectome Project, WU-Minn Consortium [1U54MH091657]
  6. NIH
  7. McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University
  8. MPI CBS
  9. DZNE site Magdeburg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cytoarchitectonic map as proposed by Brodmann currently dominates models of human sensorimotor cortical structure, function, and plasticity. According to this model, primary motor cortex, area 4, and primary somatosensory cortex, area 3b, are homogenous areas, with the major division lying between the two. Accumulating empirical and theoretical evidence, however, has begun to question the validity of the Brodmann map for various cortical areas. Here, we combined in vivo cortical myelin mapping with functional connectivity analyses and topographic mapping techniques to reassess the validity of the Brodmann map in human primary sensorimotor cortex. We provide empirical evidence that area 4 and area 3b are not homogenous, but are subdivided into distinct cortical fields, each representing a major body part (the hand and the face). Myelin reductions at the hand-face borders are cortical layer-specific, and coincide with intrinsic functional connectivity borders as defined using large-scale resting state analyses. Our data extend the Brodmann model in human sensorimotor cortex and suggest that body parts are an important organizing principle, similar to the distinction between sensory and motor processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available