4.2 Article

Four-wavelength near-infrared peripheral oximetry in cardiac surgery patients: a comparison between EQUANOX and O3

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 253-259

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-0025-z

Keywords

Near-infrared spectroscopy; Regional oxygen saturation; EQUANOX monitor; O3 monitor; Cardiac surgery

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a continuous and noninvasive technology that measures regional tissue oxygen saturation (rSO(2)). A new 4-wavelength generation of NIRS monitors is now available. We aimed to compare peripheral somatic rSO(2) values given by the 4-wavelength EQUANOX (TM) 7600 device (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, Mn) and O3 (TM) device (Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA). Twenty adult patients scheduled for conventional elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass over a 4-month period were included after local Ethics Committee approval. For each patient, 2 NIRS sensors (EQUANOX and O3) were placed over the medial part of the forearm. Thirteen couples of measurements were performed at predefined intraoperative time points. We compared 260 couples of absolute intraoperative rSO(2) values. No significant difference was found between both monitors: EQUANOX median rSO(2) 60% (95% CI 57-62) versus O3 median rSO(2) 62% (95% CI 61-64), P = 0.103. Bias was 4.0% and limits of agreement were +/- 26.3%. Significant correlations were evidenced between EQUANOX and O3 rSO(2) absolute values: rho = 0.758 (95% CI 0.701-0.806), P < 0.0001, and rSO(2) percent maximum difference versus baseline: rho = 0.582 (95% CI 0.188-0.815), P = 0.007. While absolute values of rSO(2) given by both devices were equivalent and well correlated, the clinical agreement is probably not acceptable, meaning that EQUANOX and O3 are not interchangeable in routine practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available