4.8 Article

Impact of Aggregation on the Photochemistry of Fullerene Films: Correlating Stability to Triplet Exciton Kinetics

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 27, Pages 22739-22747

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b03298

Keywords

triplet exciton kinetics; aggregation; fullerenes; photo-oxidation; stability; PC61BM

Funding

  1. Ser Cymru Programme: National Research Network in Advanced Engineering Materials, Welsh Assembly Government [NRN093]
  2. EU Cheetah project
  3. EPSRC [EP/M025020/1, EP/K030671/1]
  4. Imperial College Junior Research Fellowship scheme
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K030671/1, EP/N020863/1, 1375475, EP/M025020/1, EP/J021199/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/K030671/1, EP/N020863/1, EP/M025020/1, EP/J021199/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The photochemistry and stability of fullerene films is found to be strongly dependent upon film nanomorphology. In particular, PC61BM blend films, dispersed with polystyrene, are found to be more susceptible to photobleaching in air than the more aggregated neat films. This enhanced photobleaching correlated with increased oxygen quenching of PC61BM triplet states and the appearance of a carbonyl FTIR absorption band indicative of fullerene oxidation, suggesting PC61BM photo-oxidation is primarily due to triplet-mediated singlet oxygen generation. PC61BM films were observed to undergo photo-oxidation in air for even modest (<= 40 min) irradiation times, degrading electron mobility substantially, indicative of electron trap formation. This conclusion is supported by observation of red shifts in photo- and electro-luminescence with photo-oxidation, shown to be in agreement with time-dependent density functional theory calculations of defect generation. These results provide important implications on the environmental stability of PC61BM-based films and devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available