4.5 Article

A bifactor-ESEM representation of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Wellbeing

Journal

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 216-222

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.062

Keywords

Wellbeing; Eudaimonia; ESEM; Bifactor analysis

Funding

  1. Regione Autonoma della Sardegna [Grant Premialita L.R. 7 agosto] [7]
  2. Regione Autonoma della Sardegna [Grant Master & Back percorsi di rientro]
  3. Fondazione Banco di Sardegna [Grant PRID]
  4. Regione Autonoma della Sardegna [Grant Visiting Professor scheme]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study aims to provide an improved representation of the factor structure of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Wellbeing (QEWB) through the application of the bifactor-exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) framework Using a convenience sample of 438 Italian students (233 males; 205 females, M-age = 18.5) we contrasted the original unidimensional model (Waterman et al., 2010), with Schutte, Wissing, and Khumalo's (2013) 3- and 4- factor models, while contrasting alternative representations of the QEWB (CFA, ESEM, bifactorCFA and bifactor-ESEM). Our results supported the superiority of a bifactor-ESEM solution including three specific factors (Sense of Purpose, Purposeful Personal Expressiveness, and Effortful Engagement) and a global eudaimonic wellbeing factor. Importantly, the results revealed that the items associated with the Sense of Purpose and Effortful Engagement subscales tapped into relevant specificity over and above participants' global levels of eudaimonic wellbeing. Finally, our results supported the criterion-related validity of the global eudaimonic wellbeing, which was found to correlate with measures of life satisfaction and self-esteem. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available