4.5 Article

Low Genetic Differentiation and Evidence of Gene Flow among Barley Landrace Populations in Tunisia

Journal

CROP SCIENCE
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 1585-1593

Publisher

CROP SCIENCE SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2016.05.0298

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tunisian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces, representing the oldest cultivated accessions, are growing in scattered populations across drought-and salt-stressed environments and constitute a precious reservoir of potentially useful traits for breeding programs. The objective of this study was to elucidate genetic diversity and population structure of barley landraces across the landscape of Tunisia. Populations from 11 geographic zones were genotyped using 21 nuclear microsatellites. A high level of genetic polymorphism with 170 detected alleles was recorded among the studied genotypes. The average allelic richness was 8.095 alleles per locus. The index of genetic diversity (H-e) showed an average of 0.741. Genetic diversity was very high within populations, whereas differences among populations were difficult to detect. Only 0.15% of the DNA variation was apportioned among landraces (P < 0.001), whereas 99.85% of the DNA variation was maintained within these landraces. A high gene flow (Nm) was revealed among the investigated populations, which has been facilitated by exchange of barley seeds between Tunisian cereal farmers of different regions. Genetic diversity within Tunisian barley landrace germplasms may help to maintain adaptation to a broad range of environmental conditions and provide genetically diverse resources for barley breeders. Both ex situ (seed banks) and in situ (on-farm) conservation strategies may be required to maintain barley landrace genetic resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available